NEET
04/12/2026 (Sun) 01:18
[Preview]
No.992663
del
>>992646It was on the tv, im on phone.
Its a recent one with two women and another man.
Didnt really like the scale of lib democracy - autocracy - monarchy
Trying to make it seem linear and opposing rather than just different.
Expecting Venetian city states, like Hong Kong or Singapore but owned by single people/trusts where they can have internal dictatorships but still capital trading. Worst thing would be one entity owning more than one and then controlling trade, or trading with itself andkilling competition.
They could do it now, 50b for some port city in a shithole and only have enough resourse for a small population and have just their needs met through automation of production.
Cities where inside, its a utopia and fuck everyone who cant afford it. I think thats why these silicone valley cunts like Indians so much, caste works. You and your own close community's transient wants outweigh others basic needs requirements.
Its hard to argue against it without sounding like a 'think about the children' save the vulnerable because.. i feel like its moral or something.
If you only worried about a select group becoming exceptional and prosperous, rather than saving the world, even at the expense of the world, its arguablely much better. A population that is on top is going to provide more for humanity as a whole (like how it will be seen in a history book) than 50 half functioning social welfare states that are all wasting time on people they wont get a return on. Catastrophe will trigger the new era and we'll remember the outcome more than the cause because that's what matters.