/g/ - Technolo/g/y

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing	x size canvas
File(s)	Drag files to upload or click here to select them
Spoiler

Response to RMS the hacker known as 4chan 04/06/2021 (Tue) 14:36:45 [Preview] No. 89 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

They're attacking you for two reasons:
1) To save money: To prevent another multi-million dollar settlement (FSF vs Cisco). With you gone it wont happen. They also don't want to have to "pay off" the FSF by contributing donations either (which would increase your ability to hire lawyers and sue violators (even when the outcome of the action is difficult to predict (thus no contingency))).

2) Cultural reasons: the rest of the "they" believe that you like young girls: In your heart. And they oppose any man liking girls. That is: they believe you have thoughts and they oppose any man having such thoughts. Men are mules that must work for, fight, and give their life for women, their country, etc. Not live for themselves. Not have happiness. Only toil and responsibility.

You noted once that your life has been incredibly sad.
Being denied the purest love would fit the bill.

They hate you for what they think you believe in your mind. What they believe that they have deduced from your previous wrightings. They hate you for your thoughts they ascribe to you. For having those thoughts. For being capable of having those thoughts.

We've been defending you in the various programmer and anime forums, including your previous statements. For years, and now aswell. The namecalling is going every which way and both sides hate eachother:

On one side there are the old hackers, the men, and the anime-lovers, the NEETs. The beloved language is C.

On the other side are the wage-workers, and the Rust programming language (C++ ... plus plus... basically: and it takes just as much memory to compile as C++ code).

The fight is as hot as molten lead: and there is real true hatread.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 04/06/2021 (Tue) 14:37:18 [Preview] No.90 del

The other side bans us and deletes our words in every area they can. They attempt to fire us (sorry: we don't have programmer jobs: we are hackers and NEETs: we code for pleasure: not danegeld) We wonder what happens when words cannot be spoken?

Bascially it's libertarians vs "correctly-thinking" americans. C vs Rust.
Neets vs Wage-workers.
Hackers vs Corps (but I repeat myself).

We wanted a world where we had freedom. To have the freedoms that men of the ancient times had. And we, who defend you, agree with the statements you recanted under pressure.

(For the record: one of the projects I contribute to (fully free-software) is ChaosEsque:Anthology (3d FPS with over 200 weapons, and procedural generation of cities with building interiors), and we've added a statement of support to our project page on moddb in support of you and your rights, we also battle in the forums, we have also been signed to the support letter)

the hacker known as 4chan 04/06/2021 (Tue) 14:40:02 [Preview] No.91 del

(in response to:)
>[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
>[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>I appreciate your moral support.
>Would you like to support me in a practical way?
>
>
>You could post for me in public forums where people
>are arguing about this. Especially the ones where my supporters
>are NOT the majority. Stay calm, and avoid name-calling!
>
>
>Here are references useful to publicize:
>
>* To state support.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/12/2021 (Fri) 05:40:08 [Preview] No. 81 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Xonotic removes "team members" (developer) for insulting people.

><divVerent> Well... strong words are not disallowed, but using strong words to insult others (players or developers alike) falls under invective.
><divVerent> Like, you can call a core gameplay mechanic of first person shooters "shitscan" all you like, that's allowed.
><divVerent> But the moment you attack the people, a line has been crossed.

This is what you get for contributing code etc to opensource: Judged and "sanctioned". You're seen as no-better than a non-contributor/player.

> https://forums.xonotic.org/showthread.php?tid=8522
> https://xonotic.devfull.de/xonvote:27500/poll/405

--

divVerent supports sawing off the dicks of kids
"if a doctor approves"
><divVerent> if a doctor diagnoses a condition that can be helped by SRS, and "whoever is legally responsible" (depending on age and jurisdiction, parent and/or child) consents
><divVerent> there's no problem

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/12/2021 (Fri) 05:47:58 [Preview] No.82 del

>However, nonexclusive licenses are revocable (meaning the copyright owner can revoke the license at any time) in the absence of consideration.
>https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/creating-written-contract-transfer-or-license-rights-under-copyright

> [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases
> code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.
> --David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

>p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the
>plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee
>were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the
>license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending
>the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest
>is revocable."
>--Lawrence Rosen
>https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/013148787

the hacker known as 4chan 04/04/2021 (Sun) 05:20:22 [Preview] No.88 del

Are you actually surprised assholes get kicked off a team? Come on.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/18/2021 (Thu) 06:48:06 [Preview] No. 85 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Is this the right way to talk with Xonotic? Asking for a friend...

> [email protected] (QuakeNet)
>01:53 -!- Irssi: Starting query in QuakeNet with bones_was_here
>01:53 <wpr> .
>01:53 <wpr> ><bones_was_here> if mikee's claims were a) true b) put into
> practise, he would lose access to the code his chaos anthology is
> based on
>01:53 <wpr> My claims are true. It is your choice to disbelieve the 3
> lawyers/law-offices I cited.
>01:53 <wpr> No I would not "lose access" to the code my fork is based on: the
> source code is allready out there. I would "lose" the legal right
> to use the code: but I would ignore such and continue doing so:
> this is a hobby: not a "jehrb". FreeSoftware was never based
> hard-and-fast on US law. The GPL is a "hack" of US law: it works
> "well enough" mostly based on the fact that 1) other juristictions
> exist (remeber

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/18/2021 (Thu) 06:50:03 [Preview] No.86 del

>01:58 <wpr> 1) Anti-child bride
>01:58 <wpr> 2) pro-feminism
>01:58 <wpr> 3) pro-dick-sawing
>01:58 <wpr> that would make me happy
>01:58 <wpr> to FUCK you pieces of shit enemies over
>01:58 <wpr>
>01:58 <bones_was_here> good luck in your fight against the entire world
>01:58 <wpr> and either way: I have the code: I do not "lose access" to it
>01:59 <bones_was_here> it would be removed from anywhere you post it
>01:59 <wpr> It's right here on my machines, and on the 100s of dvds/cds/blurays
> I have
>01:59 <wpr> bones_was_here no it would not
>01:59 <wpr> I could simply host it in germany
>01:59 <wpr> which has adversarial rules regarding this issue
>02:00 <wpr> or any other non-common-law country
>02:00 <bones_was_here> if you have free software and the people who write it,
> so much, why don't you just fuck off?

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/18/2021 (Thu) 06:51:27 [Preview] No.87 del

>02:07 <wpr> everything is boring by then.
>02:08 <wpr> wellfare? what are you talking about?
>02:08 <wpr> home?
>02:08 <wpr> I'm on vacation right now.
>02:08 <wpr> 1/4th the time I'm on vacation, you didn't know that?
>02:08 <bones_was_here> most people when on vacation, go somewhere nice
>02:08 <bones_was_here> you go to your computer and... spam shit on irc?
>02:08 <wpr> I'm at a condo.
>02:08 <bones_was_here> wow what a vaction
>02:09 <bones_was_here> wish i could be as wealthy as you
>02:09 <wpr> since you lust for consumer goods: obviously
>02:09 <bones_was_here> see how people with real wealth, are out on their yacht,
> starting a new company, flying into space, buying a
> pacific island
>02:09 <wpr> lol
>02:09 <wpr> people with real wealth marry little girls
>02:09 <bones_was_here> but you? you use your wealth to buy... some time to be

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

US Government Agencies I.P. Addresses the hacker known as 4chan 03/14/2021 (Sun) 19:49:58 [Preview] No. 84 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

US Government Agencies I.P. Addresses

https://textbin.net/5nrwaojlyd

US Government Agencies: Blacklist compiled by SquidBlacklist.org on 5/24/2014.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, SUPREME COURT, CONGRESS, US MILITARY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, CIA, FBI, DHS, DEA, ATF, FEMA, NASA, EPA, NSA, US AIRFORCE, US ARMY, US NAVY, NATO, CDC, CONTRACTORS, PENTAGON, US MARSHALLS, SAVVIS, and others....

DANGEROUS I.P. ADDRESSES THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER SCAN the hacker known as 4chan 03/14/2021 (Sun) 19:34:16 [Preview] No. 83 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

DANGEROUS I.P. ADDRESSES THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER SCAN

https://textbin.net/krdysfuwvs

the hacker known as 4chan 03/11/2021 (Thu) 05:40:16 [Preview] No. 76 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Can someone publish ChaosEsqueAnthology to Steam?

I don't want to.
Can you?

moddb.com/games/chaosesqueanthology

the hacker known as 4chan 03/11/2021 (Thu) 05:42:08 [Preview] No.77 del

the hacker known as 4chan 03/11/2021 (Thu) 05:43:40 [Preview] No.78 del

the hacker known as 4chan 03/11/2021 (Thu) 05:45:24 [Preview] No.79 del

the hacker known as 4chan 03/11/2021 (Thu) 06:32:41 [Preview] No.80 del

FTE dev was mad
https://rbt.asia/g/thread/80439845/#

<eukara> really getting desperate using a russian proxy, why even bother posting when nobody wants to hear what you have to say?
><eukara> you end up banned. every. single. time.
><starsomething> I've never been banned
><starsomething> anyway I did what you couldn't or wouldn't
><starsomething> 4 million ents in DP
><eukara> you're fucked in the head, right?
><starsomething> suck on it faggot dick chopping-supporter
><starsomething> nope
><eukara> clearly
><starsomething> I'm a licensed attorney.
><starsomething> what are you?
><eukara> prove it
><eukara> you're making a lot of assumptions about others being inferior to you, when you do not know them and you're clearly an egolomaniac
><eukara> but you could never exercise power over another adult, that's why you target kids

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/03/2021 (Wed) 05:01:47 [Preview] No. 75 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

iscord.gg/FaKSAaKFhs
We are a genuine Christian server
We try to convert people to christianism, arguments are welcome, also this server is not for people who get mad easily

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 08:07:32 [Preview] No. 68 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

Grsecurity GPL Violations: Linus/FSF/SFConservancy won't defend. Claw back your copyrights. BSD-in-Practice was not the deal.

Silence is consent.

>Are there FOSS developers making decent money via Patreon, GoFundMe, whatever?

Yes, Grsecurity is making good money.
They simply added a no-redistribution agreement to their patch of the Linux Kernel.
> ( https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ )

The FSF, Software Freedom Conservancy, and the Corporate Linux Kernel Developers all agree that this is fine (silence is consent).

> https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
>Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
> Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 08:32:36 [Preview] No.69 del

>>79492216
>( silence is consent)
And that's all we hear from the FSF, SFConservancy, Linus, LKML, etc: because they DO agree (effectivly) with Grsecurity.

As Bradly Spengler identified:
> https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
>Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
> Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>>LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

To point out Grsecurity is violating a clause in the GPL, THE CENTRAL CLAUSE (share and share alike): is to be a mysoginist, woman-hating, girl loving, pedo.

So the FSF, SFConservancy, and LKML don't "go" there.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 08:35:23 [Preview] No.70 del

This is about which FOSS devs are making bank off of FOSS. There are TWO(2):

*Linus Trovalds
*Bradly Spengler.

*Linus Trovalds is paid 1.3 million dollars per year likely under contract to forgoe the excercise a legal right he has: to sue violators of his copyright.

If he violated that agreement, (identified) third-party beneficiaries to that contract could attempt to seek to recovery of whatever liquidated damages are specified in that contract.

*Bradly Spengler simply adds a No-Redistribution clause to his linux-kernel patch. As he notes: the FSF and _SFConservancy_ all support him in this (it's 2020, he started doing it years ago, they have said nothing against him)

> https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
>Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
> Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>>LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/03/2021 (Sun) 02:59:28 [Preview] No.71 del

>>79494901 →
>>79493254 →
>>If you modify a Work, but then just publish the modifications (ie: "change the word in page X to FOO", "add this paragraph to page Y") that is also a NON-SEPERABLE derivative work, that the Copyright owner of the parent Work you are changing has rights to control/disallow/etc. EVEN THOUGH you might only be distributing your "changes").

>Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

Read a Copyright casebook.
"Oh it's just a claim, bla bla bla"
No it's straight from copyright 101, stupid fucking white FUCK.

You really think that you aren't creating a derivative work based on another work when you "just" publish your changes, you piece of fucking shit.

As I said: white men do not accept any of this, but it is the law. Read a line of cases.
What you "heard" was wrong. There are no "clever" workarounds you white fuck.

>DURRR TEACH ME COPYRIGHT 101 FOR FREE
Go enroll in lawschool fucktard.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/03/2021 (Sun) 02:59:53 [Preview] No.72 del

>Do you have a source for that claim? That seems pretty strongly at odds from what I've heard about derivative works.

What you "heard" was garbage from other white fucking idiots, not from lawyers.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/03/2021 (Sun) 03:00:25 [Preview] No.73 del

>>79493254 →
>CCIIITTAATTIOONN NEEEDDEDDD!!!!!
>U R LYING,
>DURRR WHOITE POWHARRRR
17 U.S.C. §101.:
”[a] ‘derivative work’ as a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgement, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’.” 17 U.S.C. §101.

>A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

>A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

>A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

>A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a ‘derivative work’

The LKML deleted my Grsecurity GPL violation email. the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:06:11 [Preview] No. 60 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518
> The message you requested cannot be found.
>The message you requested cannot be found. The message with the url http://feisty.lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/2518 does not exist in the database.

2 posts and 1 image omitted.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:07:48 [Preview] No.63 del

>>79489051
>Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Ask them.
Email them at linux-kernel(at)vger.kernel.org
Then check lkml.org
Ask them why they ignore the Grsecurity GPL violation.

>>79489063
Didn't think they'd delete it. LKML used to not censor. They also used to debate such things.

Here is a new email sent:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/1/115
(Which the wayback machine's save-page-now won't archive, just spins and spins and spins)

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:08:35 [Preview] No.64 del

>>79489051
>Why do they cling to gpl if they just ignore it?
Why do enemies pretend to be friends?
They want you to do work for them for free: so they induce in you a belief that you will get code by way of the GPL if anyone modifies the code you contribute.

This is what drives the free-labour done. They then ban and delete any complaints about GPL violations, or stay silent and do not talk about them. The FSF and the Software Freedom Conservancy are the same, as Bradly Spengler notes:

> https://twitter.com/spendergrsec/status/1293155787859206146
>Importantly, neither the FSF nor the SFC, nor in fact any actual lawyer agrees with this bizarre claim from an anonymous troll. More info about the source of the claim can be found here: https://grsecurity.net/setting_the_record_straight_on_oss_v_perens_part1
> Thanks for doing your part, "Dr" to continue the troll's harrassment

>>LOL. " #GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the #GCC #copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works...

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:08:53 [Preview] No.65 del

The FSF and the SFConservancy and "Any Lawyer" believe that claiming that Grsecurity violates the GPL by restricting redistribution is a "unsupported bizzare claim" according to Bradly Spengler.

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:09:11 [Preview] No.66 del

https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

the hacker known as 4chan 01/02/2021 (Sat) 07:09:29 [Preview] No.67 del

The FSF head does NOT use free software: he is an apple faggot. Same with the SFconservancy (who don't do anything anyway, much like the FSF).

The only thing they do is:
1) Effectively embezzle donations
2) Pay themselves
3) Pay women
4) Give terrible legal advice.
5) Ban anyone who discusses GPL enforcement.

the hacker known as 4chan 03/25/2019 (Mon) 13:15:30 [Preview] No. 54 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]

just now on #xubuntu
> Hello sir
> how are you
> My laptop is 2gb ram and 380 gb hardisk
> can i use xubunt

the hacker known as 4chan 10/03/2019 (Thu) 17:42:49 [Preview] No.55 del

idk why i thought it was funny at the time but it was

the hacker known as 4chan 08/25/2020 (Tue) 16:09:23 [Preview] No.56 del

this is actually really funny