晩御飯何食べたがお？

がおる保管庫
http://so2tegao.weblog.tc/

神の存在を信じますか？

馬鹿は与えられるものではなく、自らの手で勝ち取るもの
１５スレとったどー

動物総合

前スレ
>>138170

春の期待

dump whatever

http://zithromax2020.com/ - zithromay

テレビスレ

ネタ・画像・映像
なんでもいいよ

NEW GAME !スレぞい！

http://ordercialisonline.us.com/ - cost of daily cialis

ムジーナ

？

http://metformin.capetown/ - metformin hcl 1000

http://propranolol.irish/ - propranolol

http://torsemide.recipes/ - torsemide

http://cipro.joburg/ - cipro

http://buyfurosemideonlinenorx.us.com/ - furosemide

Below you will find the extraction from the book of David Deutsch, "The fabric of Reality", which feels very appealing to my taste. What do you think about our ability to comprehend Reality in general, or about the book, if you've read it?

Now I return to the question I posed in the previous chapter, namely whether, if we had only a virtual-reality rendering based on the wrong laws of physics to learn from, we should expect to learn the wrong laws. The first thing to stress is that we *do* have only virtual reality based on the wrong laws to learn from! As I have said, all our external experiences are of virtual reality, generated by our own brains. And since our concepts and theories (whether inborn or learned) are never perfect, all our renderings are indeed inaccurate. That is to say, they give us the experience of an environment that is significantly different from the environment that we are really in. Mirages and other optical illusions are examples of this. Another is that we experience the Earth to be at rest beneath our feet, despite its rapid and complex motion in reality. Another is that we experience a single universe, and a single instance of our own conscious selves at a time, while in reality there are many. But these inaccurate and misleading experiences provide no argument against scientific reasoning. On the contrary, such deficiencies are its very starting-point.

http://buyclomid.network/ - clomiphene for sale

なぜ？どうして？何のために？

きたし！