>>78574
no you are not a femcel, you are just a faggot with choped dick. kill yourself please, make the world better by disapearing. evrybody gonna be thankfull

>>78574
You're that Finn aren't you

>>78574
love you from india mam <3
i wish to marry a white tranny some day

>>78925
"everybody" and it's one spiteful person that likes to see people die, even if they are trans. don't hit the door on the way out, ok?
>>78764
more like
>can trans keep appropriating femcel culture? you are a worthful GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and also based

>>78925
I would rather see those victims kill those predators who groomed & abused them in the first place you fucking turd. Grooming kids should be considered an act of terrorism, the death penalty by public hanging or lynching.

What's left of it anyway, notice all those products are major brands owned by the same monopolist shareholders. It's not like there is anything authentic or hand crafted or produced from independent small business. Someone probably was smart years ago, stocked up on Sams Club goods when they were cheaper and now selling the products after a few years price inflation. Or they dumpster dived behind Sams Club or Walmart, grabbed up expired goods and selling them at low ball prices. There used to be small town shops that would do that often but they are few and far between today. Last one of those discount shops I went to was several years ago in a small town 20 minutes away but it closed down.

Doesn't it only take two decades to subvert a population enough to destroy it's future? I think we are about there already. The billionaires are not paying for offshore underground bunkers for no reason. They know.

Are they finally figuring out too much technology is destroying young brains!? That we literally LOST a whole generation to brain rot!?

What those pilots did is justified. If their own governments treat them like shit, slander them and don't give them good pay they deserve better opportunities to work for someone else. It is the same concept for free market capitalism, if a national government makes it hard, burdensome and too costly to manufacture and produce products domestically then the industry will move to greener pastures. Same with consumers choosing what to support and what not to support, those that provide the best products and services deserve to thrive, the companies that make shit that breaks down in two years or barely works deserves to go bankrupt. This is the only sane economic and civilizational solution.

Trust is a reward based system. You have to earn it over time. You can easily do the opposite and burn bridges and the British government did exactly that. You do not get loyalty and trust unless you prove you are worth it.

I don't blame Ukraine for fighting back, obviously they have the right to because Russia decided to invade (despite them having some legit concerns about NATO expansion).

What I do blame is the stupid corrupt 'leaders' of the West for trying to get us all involved in a suicidal war against Russia, a nuclear and industrial superpower. They are completely insane. No one in their right mind wants to get involved in that horrific deadly prolonged war of death and carnage.

Honestly I do not care who wins. However if the Western nations join in it is a strong possibility everyone stands to lose because we'd be pushing a nuclear force into a very desperate position and they might see no other solution but to make a nuclear first strike.

>>78813
(Continued from my previous post)

This project outlines one such structural alternatives to force global cooperation:
https://www.change.org/GlobalGovernmentNow

What would your blueprint for a functional global structure look like if you had to design it from scratch? Let's discuss.

>>78814
I think one way we could solve some of these dire issues is to strip all national governments from making any decisions on global trade and foreign policy, limit military expenditure and military budgets for every country, strip the ability of governments to conscript people into wars, arm all citizens and make citizens and businesses the decision makers when it comes to foreign policy rather than governments/bureaucracy. Citizens are prone not to desire wars because it impacts the civilian population horrifically for the benefit of a few, so we are the ones that would make the most rational foreign policy decisions. If you can have unbiased AI to somehow enforce this, along with a global Constitution similar to what the American Founding Fathers adopted (albeit this time with far more limits on governments AND corporations) then that would be totally ideal. America's Founding Fathers just were not radical enough in my opinion, too many loopholes exist in our Constitution.

>>78815
Another idea would be to have a one world currency backed by resources such as oil and gold. Everyone could use it, but no one could sanction or control the currency, because governments would be stripped of that power completely. The currency could be used by everyone and anyone, no one in control of it other than nations making sure they have domestic reserves of oil and gold (among other commodities backing that currency). When all governments are limited in their ability to rig and disrupt the economy and free markets can flourish, normally uninterrupted, based solely on supply and demand (NOT political control!) then everything would work wonderfully, we would go back to a golden age of peace and prosperity, fair competition based on consumer choice and free enterprise. If some punk runs a bad business model and no one likes them they go bankrupt, no bailouts. If consumers like what you provide your business stands to thrive. Simple as.

>>78769
OP here. My full response to the ongoing debate and the realists is in the attached image below.

Check out the project blueprint here:
https://www.change.org/GlobalGovernmentNow

The same people who scream and cry about "China's social credit score" do this kind of shit. Hypocrisy at it's finest.

It reminds me of the saying "they'll beat on you while they kvetch as victims."

>>78844
Depends on what you are doing and what you are running on those older operating systems. Many of them work fine if you don't allow garbage bloating the system.

(OP Here)
>>78844
Depends a lot if you let the system get bloated, most of the NT issues a long time ago(and even now) Were heavily caused by:
- Badly Written Software
- Hardware Issues
- User Error

And as >>78845 said:
>Many of them work fine if you don't allow garbage bloating the system.
Which is true even for newer(lesser) versions of the same OS.

>>78817
me too brother

>>78862
Well do something about it then. There are tons of solutions out there. Tons of Linux options at ditrowatch.org and for preactivated Windows bootlegs crustywindo.ws

You can also take a look into Atlas OS which is a knock off of Windows 11 and provides you the tools needed from the start to strip out all the spyware/bloatware and help speed up the OS. atlasos.net

Not to mention you can find pretty much any older OS on torrent & p2p networks that are already activated and ready to use if you so desire. All it takes is a little effort.

>>78868
distrowatch.org